- Sheenojis: Charlie Sheen releases personalised emojisHot tips to stay fit and healthyReview; 'The Angry Birds Movie'Veerappan movie review'Phobia' movie reviewReview: 'Waiting' Actors rule the roostSonam, McKellen inaugurate Kashish Film FestivalKaran Johar celebrates birthday with star kidsWhen Salman Khan was in tears while shooting for 'Sultan'Wear the right shoe for the right occasion!
India's tennis stars Leander Paes and Rohan Bopanna stormed into the quarter-finals of the
Rejection of Das mercy plea by then President Patil illegal: SC Last Updated : 02 May 2013 08:37:55 PM IST File Photo
In a first of its kind verdict, the Supreme Court has declared as "illegal" rejection of mercy petition of death row convict M N Das by the then President Pratibha Patil and commuted the sentence to life imprisonment on ground of 12 year delay in deciding his plea.
The apex court said that Patil was "kept in the dark" by the Home Ministry about the view of her predecessor A P J Abdul Kalam who had ordered commuting Das's death sentence to life imprisonment.
"The rejection of the appellant's mercy petition is declared illegal and quashed and the sentence of death awarded to him by the trial Court, which has been confirmed by the High Court and this Court is commuted into life imprisonment," a bench headed by Justice G S Singhvi said.
Das, when he was out on bail in a murder case, had beheaded one Harakanta Das in Assam and surrendered with the victim's head on April 24, 1996 and in 1997, the sessions court there had sentenced him to death.
His conviction and sentence was subsequently upheld by the Gauhati High Court in 1998 and the Supreme Court in 1999.
He had moved in 1999 a mercy plea, which remained pending for 12 years before the President and was rejected in 2011.
The bench noted that President Kalam had on September 30, 2005 ordered for commutation of death sentence but the Home Ministry after five years again recommended rejection of Das mercy plea to then President Patil.
The bench noted that the Home Ministry, however, did not brief Patil about the view of her predecessor and she rejected the mercy plea on government's recommendation.
The bench said it was "most intriguing" that the Home Minister did not make a mention to Patil of a note dated September 30, 2005 in which Kalam had ordered for commutation.
"Why this was done has not been explained by the respondents. Though, the file containing the petition filed by the appellant and various notings recorded therein must have been placed before the President, omission to make a mention of the order passed by her predecessor from the summary prepared for her consideration leads to an inference that the President was kept in the dark about the view expressed by her predecessor and was deprived of an opportunity to objectively consider the entire matter," the bench said.Source: IANS, Other Agencies, Staff Reporters
For Latest Updates Please-
Join us on
Follow us on
Post Your Comment (0 posted):
Bollywood's dancing diva Madhuri Dixit-Nene, who is a judge on “So You Think You Can Dan
- Karlie Kloss uses teaspoon to curl her eyelashes
- Shruti Haasan set for 'Sabaash Naidu' shoot
- Seen great highs, lows and still soldiered on
- Anja Rubik uses eye shadow as lip liner
- Anu Malik recovering after surgery
- Sachin launches clothing brand, Riteish walks the ramp for it
- I am a greedy actor, says Vidya Balan
- SRK takes flight back from work to avoid traffic!
The number of people in Britain who have tried e-cigarettes has almost doubled in just two
Virtual dog to teach robots to perform tasks intelligently
The 'World's Ugliest Dog' won a Hero Award for helping people with disabilities
Bones of ancient, extinct species of bison uncovered
Hundreds witness Mercury transit in Delhi, scientists in Srinagar disappointed
Leading astronomers to see 'Transit of Mercury' from Srinagar
In a bid to heat up the premium flagship smartphone segment, Taiwan-based company HTC on T