- Real hero of India Dr Kalam is no moreJacqueline celebrates one year of 'KICK'Neha issues statement on Twitter postBollywood's smoking divasNigar Khan wedding albumAfter terror attacks in Punjab Delhi, UP put on alertSix new species of spiders found againWhy are Katrina and Ranbir giving contradictory statements on their marriage?Revealed: Besides SRK and Kajol Ajay Devgn a part of Dilwale10 Unknown facts about Kriti Sanon
Beijing and Almaty today embarked on a frantic final lobbying campaign for the 2022 Winter
Section 66A: SC issues notice to Centre and four states Last Updated : 30 Nov 2012 12:51:24 PM IST FB arrests:AG Vahanvati to appear before SC, to reply on Section 66A
The apex court, on Friday issued notices to the Centre and four states on section 66A of IT Act 2000 on a PIL in the wake of Facebook arrests.
The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Union government and states of Maharashtra, West Bengal, Delhi and Puducherry.
Attorney General GE Vahanvati appeared before the Supreme Court to clarify the govt's stand on a PIL challenging the controversial Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000.
The PIL was filed by 21-year-old Shreya Singhal,Delhi student regarding the Section 66(A) of the IT Act.
Shreya Singhal, who contended that "the phraseology of Section 66A of the IT Act,2000 is so wide and vague and incapable of being judged on objective standards, that it is susceptible to wanton abuse and hence falls foul of Article 14, 19 (1)(a) and Article 21 of the Constitution."
This controversy arose after politicians and cyber experts are of the opinion that the section should be re-written.
Singhal's PIL also wants the court to make it mandatory for police to take permission from the magistrate concerned before taking action in Indian Penal Code offences involving the freedom of speech and expression.
Singhal said that the arrests of the Mumbai girls, Shaheen Dhadha and Renu Srinivasan for their Facebook posts left a chilling effect on her and other internet users.
She said section 66(A) was susceptible to 'wanton abuse' in view of the subjective discretion of the police.
Noting that the country was "outraged" over the arrest of two girls in Maharashtra over Facebook comments, the Supreme Court on Thursday decided to examine the Information Technology Act to prevent recurrence of such incidents.
Hearing a PIL seeking amendments to the IT Act, a bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice J Chelameswar expressed surprise over how two girls were arrested in Palghar in Thane district after sunset.
While agreeing to hear the case, the bench said it was considering taking suo motu cognisance of recent incidents of arrest of people and wondered why nobody had so far challenged the particular provision of the IT Act.
"The way the little children were arrested, it outraged the sentiments of the people of the country. The way these things had been taking place needs consideration," the bench observed
Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Shrinivasan, both 21, were arrested after Dhada had criticised in a Facebook post the November 18 shutdown. Shrinivasan had 'liked' the post. The two were later granted bail shortly after they were remanded
in 14-day judicial custody.
Post Your Comment (0 posted):
Jacqueline Fernandez celebrates one glorious year of 'KICK'.
- Neha issues statement on Twitter post
- Bollywood's smoking divas
- Nigar Khan wedding album
- Late Whitney Houston daughter dies at the age of 22
- Why are Katrina and Ranbir giving contradictory statements on their marriage?
- Revealed: Besides SRK and Kajol Ajay Devgn a part of Dilwale
- HC to hear Salman's appeal against conviction from July 30
- Big B impressed with granddaughter's piano playing skill
Yuri Milner, the Russian billionaire who is funding the USD 100 million search for aliens,
If these images are to be believed, we would be seeing a couple of design innovations that